Legal Opinion

Tattnall Bank v. Powell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 10, 1935No. 11035PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hutcheson, Justice.

One wlio has an undivided one-third interest in a tract of land can not have such interest set apart to him as an exemption under the "pony homestead” law. Before he can assert his claim to the statutory exemption provided for in the Code of 1933, § 51-1301 et seq., he must bring about a partition of the land, in order that the portion to which he is entitled may be ascertained and the number of acres which can legally be exempted may be definitely known and set apart according to law. Sims v. Sims, 122 Ga. 777 (50 S. E. 937); King v. Dillon, 66 Ga. 131. The court erred in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. King v. DillonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  2. Sims v. SimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Morakes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API