Legal Opinion
City of Santa Cruz v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 22, 1988No. H003908PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZECHER, J. *
The City of Santa Cruz (City) petitions for writ review under Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, subdivision (/), after the trial court denied City’s request for summary judgment based on natural condition immunity, Government Code section 831.2, and immunity of emergen cy medical technicians, Health & Safety Code section 1799.106. We have concluded the trial court should have granted City’s motion.
Record
Plaintiff and real party in interest, Ramiro Magana, Jr., became a quadriplegic as a result of his dive into the San Lorenzo River in the City of Santa Cruz on April 3,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Milligan v. City of Laguna BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Sherwood v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Osgood v. County of ShastaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Gonzales v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Iverson v. Muroc Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Decker v. City of Imperial BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Fluehr v. City of Cape MaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Knight v. City of CapitolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Hass v. Rhodyco Prods., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.