Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 30, 2019No. CR-15-174PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRhonda K. Wood, Associate Justice

James Johnson III requests this court to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court so that it may consider a writ of error coram nobis. Although Johnson titles his motion as one to recall the mandate to seek this writ, he is mistaken in how to title the motion. Instead, we consider the motion for the substantive relief requested and treat it as a petition for writ of error coram nobis. We conclude that Johnson's petition is without merit. Accordingly, we deny relief.

To understand his petition, a brief explanation of the facts is necessary. Charles Gaskins died as a result of an aggravated…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Martinez-Marmol v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  5. Makkali v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alvin McCullough v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
  2. Stanley Ray Hunt II v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API