State v. Cameron David Harer
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GRATTON, Judge.
The State appeals from the district court’s order partially denying restitution. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand.
I
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The State charged Cameron David Harer with possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, Idaho. Code § 37-2732(a), and possession of a controlled substance, I.C. § 37-2732(c), with a second-offense enhancement, I.C. § 37-2739. Harer pled guilty to possession with intent to deliver, and the State dismissed the possession charge and the second-offense enhancement. At Harer’s sentencing hearing the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. Abelardo Dominguez GomezIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. MosquedaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. Christopher T. WeaverIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. Martin C. CardozaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Supervisor of Assessments v. Asbury Methodist Home, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- State v. Thomas Campbell KelleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
- 46264 State v. BoltonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. WildeIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. WildeIdaho Supreme Court · 2024