Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Tevelein

U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided June 29, 2016No. CGCMS 24465; Docket No. 002-69-13Published

1DissentDuignan, Judge

I stand by the rationale provided in this Court’s original unpublished opinion, decided on 06 September 2013. United States v. Tevelein, CGCMS 24465, Docket No. 002-69-13 (C.G.Ct.Crim.App.2013) [hereinafter Tevelein I]. In this en banc opinion, the majority reverses the original panel opinion of this Court and instead holds the Specification 3 of Charge III sufficient, despite omission of any *715words alleging the conduct “wrongful,” and barely discusses that use of Spice was not prohibited by any lawful order, regulation, or statute at the time of the alleged offense. Moreover, in order to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  3. United States v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  4. United States v. ClaxtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  5. United States v. BallanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API