Legal Opinion

Peller v. Katz

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdward G. Baker, J.

Defendant Schwartz moves, under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint upon the grounds 1) that same fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and 2) that plaintiff lacks legal capacity to sue.

Plaintiff is a residuary beneficiary under the will of her late father. The defendants are her two brothers who are sued individually and as executors of her father’s estate; a corporation in which decedent allegedly had a one-half stock interest, and the moving defendant, Schwartz. The complaint, in the first cause of action, inter alia, alleges…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McQuaide v. . PerotNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Long v. MajestreNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  3. Russo v. PaladinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of DeitchNew York Surrogate's Court · 1978
  2. In re the Accounting of FriedmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API