Legal Opinion

Hardwick v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The written misbehavior report, which describes with specificity the incident from which the charges arose, was authored by a Correction Officer who participated in the incident and co-signed by two other Correction Officers. That report constitutes substantial evidence to support the Hearing Officer’s determination of guilt (see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966; People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130, 140). Petitioner’s argument that the Hearing Officer should have more fully investigated the charges…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Vega v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Foster v. CoughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Perez v. WilmotNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Jackson v. LeFevreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Rivera v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. James v. StrackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Guyton v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Valdez v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API