Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Windscheffel

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 8, 1913No. 17,976PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Sherman district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

In 1887 Andrew J. Campbell and his wife executed a note and real estate mortgage, due December 1, 1892, which were afterwards sold to M. E. Dixon. On December 14, 1901, Dixon brought action on the note. The summons was served only on Campbell, although his wife was named as a party in the petition. He pleaded the statute of limitations and a trial resulted, in May, 1903, in a judgment in his favor on that issue, declaring the note to be barred. A record of the judgment contains recitals of the *825appearance of the “defendants” by counsel, but in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hoggett v. EmersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  2. Coale v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  3. Miller v. BaierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Travis v. GlickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  2. Bowman v. BowmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  3. Tracey v. BloodUtah Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API