Legal Opinion
Verasco v. Verasco
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 11, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff moved to compel the defendant to comply with certain provisions of a stipulation of settlement which was incorporated, but not merged, into their judgment of divorce. Most of the issues were resolved by the parties. The Supreme Court directed a hearing on the issue of whether the defendant was responsible for sleep-away camp expenses.
The stipulation provided that "[t]he husband shall be responsible for the payment of the children’s day camp expenses until such child reaches the age of 13 years”. The stipulation did not obligate the defendant to contribute to the cost of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Osborn v. OsbornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Silverman v. SilvermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Kromer v. KromerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Cooper v. FarrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Lenczycki v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rich v. RichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Lafferty v. LaffertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Ambrose v. AmbroseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Felicello v. FelicelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998