Legal Opinion

Aurend v. Schroeder, Admr.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1928No. 1978PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP COURT.

' The following is taken, verbatim, from the opinion.

LLOYD, J.

In our opinion Aurend, as the bailee of the automobile, bore the same relation thereto as if he had been the owner thereof. There is no evidence that he rented the automobile for Kaueher or that he, in any way, surrendered the control thereof incident to such ownership. On the contrary, he invited or permitted his friend to ride with him and to drive the automobile.

This is not a case of a person borrowing an automobile for purposes of his own and thereafter inviting the owner thereof to accompany him as a passenger…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Poole v. Wingett & ReedEast Liverpool Municipal Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API