Legal Opinion

Foote v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 7, 2001No. A01A1378PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

Jeffery Foote appeals his conviction for entering an auto, arguing that he should have been granted a continuance or a new trial because he was ill during his jury trial. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

Foote’s trial began on February 15, 1999. On that day, Foote announced ready for trial, and the parties selected a jury. Following jury selection, Foote’s counsel informed the trial court that Foote was sick and needed “to be taken to a doctor.” Counsel reported that Foote was “shaking” and that his forehead “felt hot.” The trial court questioned Foote, who stated that he had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peebles v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  2. Dasher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Kervin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Edenfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  5. Smalls v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whorton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  2. Blash v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Jackie Whorton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API