Legal Opinion

Bostain & Kinstler v. De Laval Separator Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 18, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Áppeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Harlan, C. J.)

1Opinion of the CourtSchmucker, J.

The appellee conducts at Poughkeepsie, in the State of New York, the manufacture of machines known as separators, which are used to separate cream from milk. The appellants are residents of Baltimore City but they carry on a dairy farm and creamery at Delta, in Pennsylvania.

The appellee sued the appellants in the Superior Court of Baltimore City for the price of two separators which it had sold to them on approval and which it claimed they had approved. The appellants having filed general issue pleas to the action admitted at the trial that they had purchased the separators on approval but…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marston v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  2. Pennypacker v. Capital InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  3. Latrobe and Whistler v. WinansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  4. Delamater v. ChappellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  5. Spickler v. MarshCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stiegler v. Eureka Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  2. Martin v. W. W. Lanahan & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
  3. Hollander v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API