Swift v. Kirby
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FONES, Justice.
The primary issue in this case is whether the statutory right to redeem real property sold at foreclosure, granted by T.C.A. § 66-8-101 et seq., is waived by use of the phrase “equity of redemption.”
Plaintiff, Swift, executed a deed of trust conveying real property to secure payment of a note to Commerce Union Bank in the sum of $10,000.00. He defaulted and the properly was sold by the trustee on 1 July 1982 for $8,500.00, subject to a first mortgage. Defendants Mangum, Tanley, Tan-ley & Davenport (Mangum) were the purchasers at the foreclosure sale and they paid the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kortright v. . CadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Bryan v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1939
- Street v. CalvertTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Bryan v. W. T. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Adams v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- James Paul Doherty, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Southern College of Optometry, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Meadows v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Gotten v. GottenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
- Webb Mtn, LLC v. Executive Realty Partnership (In Re Webb Mtn, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2009
- In Re MooreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.