Legal Opinion
Myers v. City of Hartford
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 10, 2004No. AC 23922PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The plaintiff, Eleanor Myers, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered following the granting of a motion for a directed verdict in favor of the defendants, the city of Hartford, Edward Grodecki and Saundra Keye Borges. The plaintiff claims that the directed verdict was granted improperly on the basis of qualified municipal immunity because the court analyzed the plaintiffs claims under General Statutes § 52-557n (a) (2), rather than under General Statutes § 7-465, the terms of which do not allow for this type of municipal immunity. The plaintiff also claims that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Clohessy v. BachelorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Spears v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Deleo v. NusbaumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Hibner v. BrueningConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Grady v. Town of SomersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Martel v. Metropolitan District CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Bonington v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Carla Strickland v. Kathryn and Jeremy MedlenTexas Supreme Court · 2013
- Odom v. MatteoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.