Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Vincennes Bridge Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 1928No. 257; Docket No. 29,311PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMouton, J.

The defendant was engaged in constructing a bridge across Pearl River,.- and ■ through • one - -Decker,- ■ its foreman, employed plaintiff to haul steel from freight cars at Pearl River Station to where it was erecting the bridge, a distance of about half a mile. The steel had to be unloaded by plaintiff from freight cars at the station, and had to be hauled by him in a truck to the bridge where it was to be used in its construction. The contract, a verbal one, was made on May 30, 1926. Plaintiff, under the agreement was to haul all'the'steel that was then at the station, which it was figured…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robideaux v. HebertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  2. Burt v. Davis-Wood Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  3. W. T. Adams Machine Co. v. NewmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  4. Clark v. Tall Timber Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  5. Barrow v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. James v. Hillyer-Deutsch-Edwards, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Cobb v. Long Bell Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Hall v. Southern Advance Bag & Paper Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Felts v. SingletaryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API