Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mary K. Biester
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1.
2Per curiam
We review the report filed by Referee Dennis J. Flynn recommending the court suspend Attorney Mary K. Biester's license to practice law in Wisconsin for the maximum period allowed for multiple violations of supreme court rules, including converting client funds. Since no appeal has been filed, we review the referee's report and recommendation pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.17(2). Upon careful review of the matter, we adopt the referee's findings of fact and conclusions of law. We conclude, however, that rather than suspending Attorney Biester's license for the maximum period…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John J. CarterWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mary K. BiesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
4Cited by1 opinion
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mary K. BiesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016