Legal Opinion
State v. Trong Kim Huynh
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 21, 1993No. C6-92-1935Published
1Opinion of the Court
504 N.W.2d 477 (1993)
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
Trong Kim HUYNH, Appellant.
No. C6-92-1935.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
August 3, 1993.
Review Granted September 21, 1993.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Michael O. Freeman, Hennepin Co. Atty., Paul R. Scoggin, Asst. Co. Atty., Minneapolis, for respondent.
John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Lawrence Hammerling, Deputy State Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant.
Considered and decided by SHORT, P.J., and RANDALL and AMUNDSON, JJ.
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
This criminal appeal involves the interpretation and construction of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Clarence E. Bennett v. Kenneth Berg, Dan R. Sandford, Jr. v. Kenneth BergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- United States v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.