Legal Opinion

Dan River, Inc. v. Adkins

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided October 21, 1986No. 0827-85PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KEENAN, J.

Dan River, Inc. appeals from a decision of the Industrial Commission finding that Anne M. Adkins is permanently disabled by irreversible, third-stage byssinosis. Dan River contends: (1) that Adkins’ claim is time-barred; (2) that the Commission’s appointment of an independent expert under Code § 65.1-90 violated the Commission’s own rules and deprived Dan River of due process; and (3) that no credible evidence supports the finding of byssinosis. We hold that Adkins’ claim is time-barred and reverse the Commission’s decision.

I

Adkins worked in Dan River’s textile manufacturing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Winston v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  2. Barksdale v. H.O. Engen, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  3. James Lile Hupman v. Harold C. Cook and Cook and Robinson, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
  4. Parris v. Appalachian Power Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
  5. Buenson Division, Aeronca, Inc. v. McCauleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Island Creek Coal Co. v. BreedingCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  2. Kilgore v. BarnesMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Russell v. WillifordCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2004
  4. COM./DEPT. OF STATE POLICE v. HagaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994
  5. Walters v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API