Dan River, Inc. v. Adkins
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KEENAN, J.
Dan River, Inc. appeals from a decision of the Industrial Commission finding that Anne M. Adkins is permanently disabled by irreversible, third-stage byssinosis. Dan River contends: (1) that Adkins’ claim is time-barred; (2) that the Commission’s appointment of an independent expert under Code § 65.1-90 violated the Commission’s own rules and deprived Dan River of due process; and (3) that no credible evidence supports the finding of byssinosis. We hold that Adkins’ claim is time-barred and reverse the Commission’s decision.
I
Adkins worked in Dan River’s textile manufacturing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Winston v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
- Barksdale v. H.O. Engen, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1977
- James Lile Hupman v. Harold C. Cook and Cook and Robinson, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Parris v. Appalachian Power Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
- Buenson Division, Aeronca, Inc. v. McCauleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Island Creek Coal Co. v. BreedingCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
- Kilgore v. BarnesMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Russell v. WillifordCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2004
- COM./DEPT. OF STATE POLICE v. HagaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994
- Walters v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.