People v. Chimel
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
68 Cal.2d 436 (1968)
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
TED STEVEN CHIMEL, Defendant and Appellant.
Crim. No. 11607.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
Apr. 10, 1968.
Keith C. Monroe for Defendant and Appellant.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Ronald M. George, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
TOBRINER, J.
In this case our conclusion that the judgment of conviction should be affirmed rests upon the following propositions: (1) Although the warrants for arrest constitutionally failed under People v. Sesslin, ante, p. 418…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.