Legal Opinion

People v. Chimel

California Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1968No. Crim. 11607Published

1Opinion of the Court

68 Cal.2d 436 (1968)

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

TED STEVEN CHIMEL, Defendant and Appellant.

Crim. No. 11607.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Apr. 10, 1968.

Keith C. Monroe for Defendant and Appellant.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Ronald M. George, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

TOBRINER, J.

In this case our conclusion that the judgment of conviction should be affirmed rests upon the following propositions: (1) Although the warrants for arrest constitutionally failed under People v. Sesslin, ante, p. 418…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API