Legal Opinion

Shawn Miller v. Better Home & Finance Holding Company

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 20, 2026No. 3:25-cv-07893Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SHAWN MILLER, Case No. 25-cv-07893-EMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 BETTER HOME & FINANCE HOLDING COMPANY, Docket No. 45 11 Defendant. 12 13 This is a second attempt at a class action against Defendant Better Home & Finance 14 Holding Company. The Court dismissed the original complaint because the sole putative lead 15 plaintiff, Ms. Leanos, was facially barred by the statute of limitations and the delayed discovery 16 doctrine did not apply to her claim. Dkt. No. 37. On May 14, 2026, Ms.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. KRUPSKI v. COSTA CROCIERE S. P. ASupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  4. ASARCO, LLC v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. China Agritech, Inc. v. ReshSupreme Court of the United States · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API