Legal Opinion

Boyd v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 29, 1982No. 11-81-090-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLOUD, Chief Justice.

Appellant appeals from a conviction for unlawful possession of methamphetamine, a controlled substance, wherein his punishment, enhanced by a prior robbery conviction, was assessed by the jury at imprisonment for twenty-five years. We will reverse and remand for a new trial.

Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to prove that he was in possession of methamphetamine because the State failed to establish the chain of custody of the substance alleged to be methamphetamine. We disagree.

*662E. H. Foerster, an assistant toxicologist, testified that he analyzed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CollierCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Ex Parte FeltonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Salinas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. Breazeale v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Breazeale v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API