Legal Opinion
Hudson County v. The Chancellor
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 13, 1954No. Civ. 851-51Published
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, District Judge.
This is a suit in admiralty, The claim •of the libellants is for the damage to the Clay Street Bridge, of which they are admittedly the owners. The Motor Tug Chancellor, Inc., as owners of the Tug Chancellor, filed a claim and answer and thereafter impleaded the Scow H.S. 89 and its owner, Steers Sand & Gravel Corporation, and the Harrison Supply Company. The claim for damage in the amount of $7,175 is admitted, and the only issue presented for determination is that of liability.
Facts
I
The Clay Street Bridge is a drawbridge of the swing type and spans the Passaic River.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- The City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Martug Towing Co. v. Eastern Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Palmer v. Agwilines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Roah Hook Brick Co. v. Erie R. Co. United States v. The Roah HookCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Jova Brick Works, Inc. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.