Legal Opinion
Rayner v. Jones
California Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1891No. 9021PublishedCited by 18 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order dismissing a motion for a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
— The complaint filed in this action is in this language: —
"Plaintiffs above named, complaining of defendants above named, for cause of complaint aver and allege that on, to wit, the eighth day of February, 1881, at, to wit, the city and county of San Francisco, state of California, the said defendants, for a valid and valuable consideration, made and executed their undertaking in writing, a copy whereof is hereto annexed and made a part of this complaint; that in and by the terms of said undertaking it is stipulated and expressed that defendant Jones (the principal in said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carpentier v. WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Chase v. EvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Naglee v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by18 opinions
- Molt v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1912
- Knowles v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Miller v. ProutIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
- United Railways & Electric Co. v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
- Brooks v. Nevada Nickel SyndicateNevada Supreme Court · 1898
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.