Stearns v. McManis
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
PEDEN, Justice.
Mr. McManis sued Mr. Stearns for slander. A trial jury found that McManis, who bred, raised, bought, and sold Saint Bernard dogs and operated a kennel, was entitled to $200 as actual damages and $1,000 as exemplary damages because Stearns maliciously called him a “puppy miller.” The term is considered disparaging by dog fanciers. It describes one whose primary interest is in selling puppies for profit with little concern for their health or for improving the breed.
*661The appellant’s points of error are based on the jury’s findings of malice and exemplary damages and on the absence…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Denton Publishing Company v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Buck v. SavageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Chemical Cleaning, Inc. v. Chemical Cleaning & Equipment Service, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1970
- Arant v. JaffeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Halbert v. City of Sherman, Tex.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Marathon Oil Co. v. Salazar, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
- Frank B. Hall & Co., Inc. v. BuckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Schauer v. Memorial Care Systems, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
- Dixon v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.