Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Levine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The better practice, in a case such as this, would be for the plaintiff to comply with the demand for the bill of particulars to the best of his knowledge; and when he lacks sufficient information to answer all the items in the demand, he should set forth such lack of knowledge under oath, and then, after an examination of the defendant, plaintiff should serve an amended or supplemental bill as to those items which requested information that is in defendant’s records and of which plaintiff had no knowledge in the absence of such examination. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Christ, Pette and Brennan,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Padro v. Boulevard HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Waldman v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API