Legal Opinion
ABADI v. TARGET CORPORATION
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 13, 2023No. 2:22-cv-02854Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AARON ABADI, : Plaintiff, : : v. : NO. 22-CV-2854 : TARGET CORPORATION, et al., : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM KENNEY, J. OCTOBER 13, 2023 I. INTRODUCTION Pro Se Plaintiff Aaron Abadi (“Abadi”) alleges that he has a disability preventing him from wearing a facemask, and that Defendant Target Corporation (“Target”) violated the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”) by insisting that he leave the store while not wearing a mask during the COVID-19 pandemic. Target moved for a judgment on the pleadings, alleging, inter…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Shamell Samuel-Bassett, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.