Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Harrington v. Inter-State Fidelity Building & Loan Ass'n

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1937No. 5372Published

1ConcurrenceWolfe, Justice

I concur, but I think it unnecessary to determine whether section 18-3-1, R. S. Utah 1933, applies to this certificate. Even if it does not, the rules of the Inter-State Fidelity Building & Loan Association may require indorsement and delivery of the certificate to pass legal title. The opinion properly states that the delivery of the unendorsed certificate with intent to vest all right, title, and interest of the son to any benefits which it evidenced in the parents, was a typical case of an equitable assignment, Milford State Bank v. Parrish, 88 Utah 235, 53 P. (2d) 72.

Whether we consider…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Milford State Bank v. ParrishUtah Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API