Ross v. University of Tulsa
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
TERENCE C. KERN, United States District Judge
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Civil Contempt (“Motion for Contempt”), in which Defendant the University of Tulsa (“TU”) seeks a citation of civil contempt and sanctions against Plaintiff and her counsel for “multiple intentional violations of protective orders concerning evidence produced in this case.” (Doc. 311 at 1.) TU seeks relief pursuant to the inherent power of the Court and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2)(A)(vii).
TU contends Plaintiff and her counsel impermissibly provided the following materials to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reno Air Racing Association, Inc. v. Jerry McCordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Merrill Scott & Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- O'Connor v. Midwest Pipe Fabrications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Grove Fresh Distributors, Inc. v. John Labatt Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Kaufman v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ralph Arnold Smith, Jr v. Hickman, Goza & Spragins, PLLCMississippi Supreme Court · 2019
- Goode v. RamsaurDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023
- Nichols v. Denver Health and Hospital AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021