Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Hammel

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 7, 1941No. 35,192PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoch, J.:

This was an action to recover against an estate on a claim based on a contention that certain funds in the possession of the decedent for many years were impressed with a trust in favor of the plaintiffs. The administrator, defendant in the action, demurred to the petition. This appeal is from an order sustaining the demurrer. There were originally two plaintiffs, but one of them assigned his interest to the other, and the remaining plaintiff is the only appellant.

The petition, filed on April 24, 1940, alleged, in substance, that T. D.…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BrasfieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  2. In Re Estate of KruseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  3. Valentine v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. Anson v. Estate of AnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Stephens v. FarwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API