Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 4, 1984No. 83-1858PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTT, Chief Judge.

Appellant was charged with armed robbery and found guilty of the lesser included offense of robbery. The trial court refused appellant’s request for a jury instruction on theft. We reverse.

The trial court is required to instruct the jury on lesser included offenses necessarily included in the major offense charged. Brown v. State, 206 So.2d 377 (Fla.1968). It is impossible to prove robbery without proving theft. State v. Bruns, 429 So.2d 307 (Fla.1983). Because theft is not two or more steps from the offense appellant was convicted of, failure to give the requested…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
  2. State v. BrunsSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  3. State v. BowdenSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  4. Bowden v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  5. Butler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pina v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. White v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Merrone v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API