Legal Opinion

Lindsay v. Eastwood

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

The plaintiff sued defendant in a justice’s court, and declared orally on all the common counts, and specially for money paid to the use of the defendant *337for a ditcb tax for the year 1884, which plaintiff paid to-discharge an assessment levied upon certain lands which he purchased of defendant in the month of September, 1885, and for which he received a full covenant warranty deed.

In 1884 the county drain commissioner of Wayne county, by virtue of proceedings taken before him, cleaned out, deepened, and widened what was called the “ Blakely Ditch. ” He ascertained the cost and expense…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. White v. GibsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Amore v. FalcoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1933
  4. Municipal Investors Ass'n v. City of BirminghamMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Pierse v. BronnenbergIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API