Legal Opinion

State on Behalf of JR v. Mendoza

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1992No. S-89-494PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

NATURE OF THE CASE

This is a paternity suit commenced by the Lancaster County Attorney, pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-512.03 (Reissue 1984). In its petition the State alleges that P.C. is receiving public assistance, commonly known as ADC payments, on behalf of her minor child J.R. The petition further alleges that the defendant-appellant, Jose Mendoza, is the natural father of J.R. The State therefore seeks a judgment to that effect and an order requiring the defendant to support the child.

The defendant answered, denying he is the child’s father. He later moved for an order joining Jesus…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Levy v. Louisiana Ex Rel. Charity HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Holste v. Burlington Northern RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Kopecky v. National Farms, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State on Behalf of Hopkins v. BattNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re Estate of WagnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Rosse v. RosseNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API