Legal Opinion

Lemp v. Pfund

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1855PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the Court

Ryland, Judge.

In this case, the court below, on motion, struck out the defendant’s answer, and judgment was then given for want of an answer. The plaintiff not requiring a jury, the court assessed the damages. The defendant prayed for an appeal, and brings the case here.

There is no motion for a new trial; no exceptions taken to any act or judgment of the court below ; no motion saved and put on record by any bill of exceptions, and there is no bill of exceptions saved in the case. There is nothing on the record for this court to look into, and there is no reason why the case should be here.

The…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morrison v. LehewMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. City of Columbia v. DorseyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API