Mosher v. Hubbard
New York Supreme Court
.THIS was art áction of assumpsit iipotí the-eommon money-counts. The defendant pleaded non-assumpsit and non assump* sit infra sex annas.
Read the full summary
.THIS was art áction of assumpsit iipotí the-eommon money-counts. The defendant pleaded non-assumpsit and non assump* sit infra sex annas. The cause was tried at the Rensselaer circuit, in June, 1816. At the trial tfe plaintiff-gave in evidence the following .“Pay William Briggs 110 dollars;-on sight, and the same shall be, passed to your credit, on a bond and mortgage which'f . 1 • • oo hold Jes^ Potter, executed by yo.u.- Your Friend, RuggUs -Hubbard. , To Mr. Daniel Eldrcd. Troy, November 7£hj 1308.” The bond and mortgage referred to in the order were dated the 19th October, 1807, and were…
1Per curiam
Seyeral questions were raised and discussed on-the argument, which it will be. unnecessary to notice, as the facts in the case will, in the opinion of .the court, support the recovery, ou the count for money had"and repeived. The order drawn by the defendant- upon Eldred, irt favour of vBriggs-, the téstátor, was, as it imports upon the face of it, to-be/credited upon a bond and mbrtgage, given by Eldred to the defendant and Jesse Potter. 'This bond and mortgage was given to them, as the administrators oLJoJvn .-Potter,, 'deceased, .for lands belonging to bis estate; and sold under an order…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Woods v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Henry v. . RootNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Shaw v. LambertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Hill v. KendallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1853
- Atwood v. CoburnSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1828
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.