State v. Harding
Court of Appeals of Utah
1DissentThorne, Judge
122 I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion, as I cannot agree with its conclusion that the search of Defendant's bags pursuant to the driver's consent was permissible. Here, the trial court expressly found that, under the cireumstances, Officer Wes-terman "had no way of knowing whose bags they were." Accordingly, I disagree that Officer Westerman can be said to have had a reasonable belief as to the driver's ownership of the bags, and I would hold that the State failed to meet its burden of demonstrating that the driver had the apparent authority to consent to the search of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Maurice Whitfield, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Ronald E. VeatchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- State v. WorwoodUtah Supreme Court · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.