Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Harding

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided January 22, 2010No. 20080772-CAPublished

1DissentThorne, Judge

122 I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion, as I cannot agree with its conclusion that the search of Defendant's bags pursuant to the driver's consent was permissible. Here, the trial court expressly found that, under the cireumstances, Officer Wes-terman "had no way of knowing whose bags they were." Accordingly, I disagree that Officer Westerman can be said to have had a reasonable belief as to the driver's ownership of the bags, and I would hold that the State failed to meet its burden of demonstrating that the driver had the apparent authority to consent to the search of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. Maurice Whitfield, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Ronald E. VeatchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. State v. WorwoodUtah Supreme Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API