Legal Opinion

Giardino v. Gardinier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1986PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: We affirm upon the ground that the court correctly determined that petitioners lacked standing to contest the granting of a use variance. Petitioners did not demonstrate that they were aggrieved by the Zoning Board of Appeals determination, and mere status as a taxpayer or business competitor is an insufficient basis for standing (Matter of Dairylea Coop. v Walkley, 38 NY2d 6, 11; Matter of Paolangeli v Stevens, 19 AD2d 763). Thus viewed, it is unnecessary to reach any other issue. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Inglehart, J. — art 78.) Present — Callahan,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dairylea Cooperative, Inc. v. WalkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Paolangeli v. W. T. StevensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kopald v. Supervisor & Town Board of HighlandsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API