Legal Opinion

Moore Et Ux. v. Doyle

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1925No. Appeal, 7PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

The plaintiffs filed a bill for the reformation and specific performance of a contract for the sale of a house and lot; the allegation of the complaint being that a parol agreement for the sale of the property described in the bill by the defendant to the plaintiffs was entered into on or about the 23d of December, 1922, with the understanding that the agreement should be reduced to writing and signed by the contracting parties. A contract was prepared and presented to the plaintiffs by one,. Long, who was acting in connection with the office of Francis Doyle, a real…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tide Water Pipe Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Glenn v. TreesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. McGowin v. RemingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849
  4. Hurst v. BrennenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. MacDougall v. Citizens National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goodman v. GoodmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Benner v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API