Legal Opinion

San Benito Bank & Trust Co. v. Rio Grande Music Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided December 28, 1984No. 13-83-188-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant Bank brought this suit on a promissory note. Appellees contended that collection on the note was barred because appellant knew that the disputed funds were to be used in an illegal transaction, and yet participated in the furtherance of that transaction. Appellees may be grouped into two sets of parties: B & P Enterprises, Lionel Betancourt and John Phillips (hereafter referred to collectively as B & P) and Frank Betancourt, Leigh Magee, Betty Wilson and Rio Grande Music Company (hereafter referred to collectively as RG Music).

RG Music was founded and operated for many years…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Harris v. RoweTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Lewis v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Castilleja v. CameroTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  4. McDonough v. ZamoraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Perkins v. NevillTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Access Telecom, Inc. v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. Ralston Purina Co. v. McKendrick, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
  3. Lawrenson v. Global Marine, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1993
  4. Elbar Invs., Inc. v. Okedokun (In re Okedokun)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2018
  5. AG VOLKSWAGEN v. Valdez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API