Legal Opinion

Riley v. Ambach

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 19, 1981No. 465, Docket 80-7600PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Circuit Judge:

The plaintiffs, and appellees in this action, are eighteen learning disabled children and their parents. The defendants, and appellants, are the State of New York and the State of New York’s Commissioner of Education, Gordon M. Ambach. The State defendants took actions: (1) defining as handicapped only those learning disabled children who exhibit a discrepancy of 50% or more between expected achievement and actual achievement, and (2) withdrawing a procedure allowing local Committees on the Handicapped (“COHs”) to assign learning disabled children to residential schools…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187 CahokiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. The Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. John w.ga Rdner, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Smith v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. J.S. ex rel. N.S. v. Attica Central SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. Georgia State Conference of Branches of Naacp, Mary Alice Covin, Mary Laurant, Sylvia Dennis, and Naomi Tucker v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Christopher W. v. Portsmouth School Committee, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. Jose P. v. AmbachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API