Legal Opinion
Fentron Architectural Metals Corp. v. Romagnino
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 16, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
69 N.J. Super. 410 (1961)
174 A.2d 491
FENTRON ARCHITECTURAL METALS CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
SAMUEL ROMAGNINO, ANTHONY ROMAGNINO AND DOMINICK ROMAGNINO, CO-PARTNERS TRADING UNDER THE FIRM NAME OF ROMAGNINO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 25, 1961.
Decided October 16, 1961.
Before Judges PRICE, SULLIVAN and LEONARD.
Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Major & Major, attorneys; Mr. James A. Major, II on the brief).
Mr. Merritt Lane, Jr., argued the cause for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Texas Co. v. Central Fuel Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Leach & Co. v. PeirsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Mattocks v. Lyman & ColeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1844
- Riley v. WeigandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- A.S. Goldstein Co. v. Bloomfield Plaza AssociatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Cruz-Diaz v. HendricksNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009