Legal Opinion

Royalty v. Strange

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 10, 1920No. 7788PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLane, J.

At a former day of the present term of this court we rendered judgment in this cause, reversing the judgment of the trial court and remanding the cause for further proceedings. Upon further consideration of the cause we have reached the conclusion that we erred in reversing the judgment and remanding the cause, and upon our own motion we now 'set aside and vacate the former judgment of this court, and affirm the judgment of the trial court, for the reasons pointed out in the following opinion:

This suit was brought by appellee, W. T. Strange, against appellants George W. Royalty, George W.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Daniel v. Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. GrabillIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Randolf v. Town of BloomfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  5. Cumberland Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. HobartMississippi Supreme Court · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Soap Corp. of America v. BalisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. City of Dallas v. NewbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Hornsby v. Crystal Beach ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. City of Olney v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. City of Olney v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API