Minnesota Valley R. R. v. Doran
Supreme Court of Minnesota
A full statement is made in this case on the appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial. (See statement preceding last opinion.) After judgment was entered upon the verdict, the plaintiff made a motion .to set aside the judgment, and all subsequent proceedings, which was denied, and it appeals from the order denying the same to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
-McMillan, J.
By the Court.This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside a judgment, and all subsequent proceedings.
The cause has already been before us on an appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial. Both appeals having been submitted together, we have arrived at the conclusion that the order denying a new trial must be reversed. *241"and a new trial granted, for error occuring on the trial in the court below. It follows from the conclusion in that case that the judgment, and all subsequent proceedings should be set aside, and vacated. It is unnecessary for us,…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Cochrane v. HalseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878