Legal Opinion
People v. Debberman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 16, 2014PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCarthy, J.
We affirm. For the reasons stated in People v Barton (113 AD3d 927 [2014] [decided herewith]), County Court properly denied defendant’s application to withdraw his guilty plea. Defendant additionally stated that he felt sleep-deprived during the plea colloquy, but County Court appropriately relied upon his responses during the colloquy and “its own extensive observations of and interaction with defendant” in determining that defendant’s purported fatigue did not call into question his ability to understand the proceedings (People v Mack, 90 AD3d 1317, 1318-1319 [2011]; see People v Alexander,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. BartonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. MackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. SotoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. RibeiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- People v. DanielsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015