Legal Opinion

State v. Exantus

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 29, 2011No. 2D10-1385PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRENSHAW, Judge.

The State appeals a trial court order granting Osner Exantus’ motion to suppress evidence based on what Exantus alleged was a facially insufficient search warrant. Exantus cross-appeals the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained from an allegedly unlawful vehicle search. We conclude the trial court erred by determining that the magistrate did not have probable cause to issue the warrant, and therefore we reverse the order suppressing the evidence and remand for further proceedings. We affirm, without discussion, the trial court’s ruling with respect to the initial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Terry v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  5. Rios v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. State v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Delapena v. Florida Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2025
  4. STATE OF FLORIDA v. GUILLERMO RODRIGUEZ LOPEZDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
  5. Sanchez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API