Legal Opinion

CARL LEE LINELL v. STATE OF ARKANSAS

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 18, 2020PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

2020 Ark. 253

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-84-9 CARL LEE LINELL Opinion Delivered: June 18, 2020 PETITIONER V. PRO SE PETITION TO REINVEST JURISDICTION IN THE TRIAL COURT STATE OF ARKANSAS TO CONSIDER A PETITION FOR WRIT RESPONDENT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS; MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL [JEFFERSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, NO. 35CR-83-26] PETITION AND MOTION DENIED. RHONDA K. WOOD, Associate Justice Carl Lee Linell petitions this court for permission to file a writ of error coram nobis in the trial court. Additionally, he has filed a motion for appointment of counsel. Linell raises four…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Newman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  4. ADRIAN LOUIS CARNER v. STATE OF ARKANSASSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  5. Martinez-Marmol v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Luther X. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2021
  2. Richard Tommy Gordon v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API