Legal Opinion
Tammy E. Neighbour v. Patrolman Michael Covert Patrolman Joseph Kenny and the Village of Cooperstown
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 27, 1995No. 63, Docket 94-9312PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant Tammy E. Neighbour appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Hurd, Magistrate J.), entered after a bench trial, dismissing appellant’s complaint in a civil rights action, the district court having determined, inter alia, that failure of police officers to give Miranda warnings is not actionable.
BACKGROUND
On September 30, 1993, appellees Officers Michael Covert and Joseph Kenny (“the officers”), two members of the Cooperstown Police Department, went to the store where Neighbour was employed to question her about property that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Amnesty America v. Town of West HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Deshawn E. ex rel. Charlotte E. v. SafirCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Cooper v. City of New RochelleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Samtani v. City of LaredoDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
- Deshawn E. v. SafirCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.