Legal Opinion

State v. King

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1980No. 2-178A26PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

The defendant-appellants (State) 1 appeal a judgment in favor of the plaintiff-ap-pellees (King) 2 which decreed that Indiana’s salary and pay plans (salary plans) from 1956 to 1976 for employees in the “state service” violated the State Personnel Act 3 by creating, even where like work was performed, pay rate schedules (salary schedules) for county welfare department employees in the “state service” (county employees) separate from and unequal to the salary schedules for other comparable state employees in the “state service” (state employees). Furthermore, for the years 1960…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State, Ind. State Highway Com'n v. SpeidelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Ray v. GoldsmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Indiana State Personnel Board v. GallowayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Dailey v. PughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Indiana Department of Revenue v. Waterfiled [Sic] Mortgage Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cox v. UbikIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Norris v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  3. JAW v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Gorski v. DeeringIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Stech v. Panel Mart, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API