Legal Opinion
Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. Donalson
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided May 12, 1933No. 9394PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
A sale of land under power contained in a security deed and conforming in all particulars to requirements of the said power, but where the advertisement contained the words: “The above land will be sold for the purpose of paying the indebtedness of the said John E. Donalson who is now deceased [our emphasis] to Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company,” was not a void sale. The case of Greenfield v. Stout, 122 Ga. 303 (50 S. E. 111), is cited as authority to the contrary. In that ease, Weston, the owner of land, executed a security deed to “E. H. Pullen, vice-president of the National Bank of the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Shumate v. McLendonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Alexander v. ChipsteadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Gilliard v. Johnston & MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Burns v. LewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Baughn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Redwine v. FrizzellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Cocke v. Bank of DawsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Williams v. South Central Farm Credit, ACACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. Et Al. v. MOLINA-SALASCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Neely v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.