Legal Opinion

Daniell v. Collins

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 22, 1966No. 23365PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cook, Justice.

The appellant’s only assignment of error is that there was a genuine issue in the case as to material facts, and that the appellee was not entitled to a summary judgment as a matter of law.

While the pleadings create genuine issues as to material facts, the depositions of the parties totally fail to support these issues as to the controlling points to be resolved by this court, namely, whether the appellant Daniell was mentally incompetent, and whether under the pleadings and depositions he was entitled to the equitable relief sought. See Crutcher v. Crawford Land Co., 220 Ga.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crutcher v. Crawford Land Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  2. Jones v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  3. McKinney v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  4. Whitley v. WhitleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  5. Sammons v. TingleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dykes v. HammockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. A. R. Hudson Realty, Inc. v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. McCracken v. Gainesville Tribune, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Griggs v. GriggsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  5. Claire v. Rue De Paris, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API