Legal Opinion

Judice v. Provost

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 15, 1866PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from the District Court, Parish of St. Mary, The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHyman, C. J.

Philemon Provost and plaintiff, who were husband and wife, acquired during their marriage community property.

Philemon Provost died, and plaintiff accepted the usufruct of Ms part of the undivided community property.

Subsequently, she made a declaration that she relinquished the usufruct on a part of the property (some land), and asked the Court to cause this part to be partitioned between her and tho deceased husband’s heirs, the defendants.

Defendants asked that the whole, not a part, of the community property be returned to be divided, or that her demand be rejected.

The District Judge…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Knapp v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
  2. Samuels v. PasternackLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API